It is often argued by some that a choice of clothing reflects an individuals cultural background as well as their character. I agree with this statement to some extent, as most of the people's outfit resembles their religion or ethnicity, however, judgment on character cannot be made from clothes.
Many people prefer to wear outfit that shows their culture or religion. For instant, Muslim women are often found wearing Burka's as their daily outfit and many married Hindu women wears Sari. So, it is evident enough that one can make a note of a person's religion depending on their outfit. The reason people prefers to wear such clothes, is it make than feel more close towards their culture and tradition. However, not every single person prefers wearing their cultural outfit.
On the other hand a persons character cannot come out from wearing any particular clothing. However, it is often seen in the society, especially with women, if a female wears clothes that shows their body, then that female is considered to have a bad character, and if they wear a traditional outfit, they are judged with having a good character. Although, such judgments are not made for male counterparts.
In conclusion, people prefer to wear outfit that often reflect their religion. In such cases a person's culture can be known. However, judging an individual's character by their dressing style is very inappropriate. Females should have to freedom to wear what they wish to, and their character should not be decided depending on their outfit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...some that a choice of clothing reflects an individuals cultural background as well as their ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nt enough that one can make a note of a persons religion depending on their outfit. The...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ultural outfit. On the other hand a persons character cannot come out from wearing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...lture can be known. However, judging an individuals character by their dressing style is ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05905511811 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57101083627 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535433070866 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3231558512 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223243220672 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975272341446 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534573293818 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163328227708 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695105886538 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.