One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that advanced technology has brought various positive aspects in human lives while others oppose it by saying that it has more negative consequences. I strongly disagree with this statement as it is boon for almost all people. I would discuss both views in following sub-section.
To commence with, there are plethora of advantages that outweigh its sinister side. The most preponderant one is that it has made human life more easy and convenient. In past days, travelling takes much time, but now it is possible in few hours which brings countries more closer. It can not only contribute to globalisation, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to a wide range of advantages it offers, masses can enhance the quality and productivity of their lives with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead as far as agumenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of aforementioned propositions is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive in varied areas. Besides, it provides great deal of communication devices that has changed the way of transferring the information. In previous time, people used to write letter to share their views which was quite slow process, however, now folks can talk anywhere, anytime by mobile phone in seconds. Also, they can post their experience and get chance to meet with like-minded people even sitting at home. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicate that modern equipment that are provided by technology, has shaped our life more effectively. Hence it is apparent why many are in favour of this viewpoint.
On the other hand a section of the society contradicts the above-said view by providing some justification. Thay reckon that technology is responsible to shrink relationship among people as nowadays, people are glued to electric gadgets which reduces face to face communication. Apart from it, it also leads to a great deal of pollution because all means of transportation emit polluted gases which may threat earth. Therefore, opponent of this view admit it wrong development of technology.
To conclude, having ponderd over above stated it is apparent that the benefits of advancement of science is indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...ossible in few hours which bring people more closer. It can not only contribute to globalis...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 719, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ded by technology, has shaped our life. Hence it is apparent why many are in favour o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'reckons'.
Suggestion: reckons
...w by providing some justification. Thay reckon that technology is responsible to shrin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Thay) must be used with a third-person verb: 'reckons'.
Suggestion: reckons
...w by providing some justification. Thay reckon that technology is responsible to shrin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrongs'?
Suggestion: wrongs
...erefore, opponent of this view admit it wrong development of technology. To conclude...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, apart from, as for, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08620689655 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85171154395 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615763546798 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.726800647 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102404723262 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244748908155 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243233639598 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524898980639 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113863498768 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.