Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a tendency between people using their smartphones for watching movies instead of going to a cinema. But there is a different opinion that some can enjoy by watching films on a huge screen in a movie theatre. I believe that a cinema gives viewers opportunities to experience breathtaking emotions.
On the one hand, modern smartphones and tablets are developed to provide our life with different useful options such as watching films. Obviously, it helps users to enjoy watching videos whatever they are and at all suitable time. Also, some do not prefer public places, so they feel comfortable at their own private places instead of going to a movie theatre. In addition, it saves time which people can waste for waiting movie-picture show, and they do not depend on movie schedules. So, modern people find it easy to see favorite movies just using their phones or tablets.
On the other hand, others argued that going to a cinema gives viewers opportunities to be deeply involved while watching films. In my opinion, the film industry offers to us a variety of movies for every age which undoubtably need to be seen in a cinema. As we can notice that film directors and actors try do their best to create legend films. One of them for example, «Avatar» by James Cameron is absolutely worth to be seen on a huge screen. Due to this kind of movies has a lot of special effects and contains enormous scenes with unearthly picturesque nature it has better effects on audience in a cinema.
To summarise, people of course has opportunities to use their phones and tablets for watching videos, but I thing they should experience the fantastic feelings of watching the best films with special effects in a cinema.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etter effects on audience in a cinema. To summarise, people of course has oppor...
^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
... and tablets for watching videos, but I thing they should experience the fantastic fe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, in addition, kind of, of course, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84459459459 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6621964602 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533783783784 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5309680592 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253284624231 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910466509001 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605370626964 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163054312384 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712839998657 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.