Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Other say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The ideology behind technology has brought comfort to certain degrees. Some think that films can be seen on our devices to avoid going to the cinema while others voiced that height of enjoyment can only be attained at the cinema. However, views and opinion would be discussed.
Technology has been reduced to the finger tip of comfort to create a world around people. It’s like having the whole world around you. To the school of thought that upholds the need that mobile device has displaced cinema built their opinion around the advance of technology. With the availability of internet facilities which helps in downloading several movies, depicts that going to cinema can be done away with. This platform brings the bowl to your comfort. Supply of electricity helps to cushion this comfort. Although this is good but it creates barrier to social connectivity, it does not allow bonding and this can result to disconnecting the binds within the society and family. This is common among teenagers.
On the contrary, having to navigate to the amphitheater gives ample and sophisticated platform to view the vibes of the theater good resolution, several effects at a large view. The arena provides you the opportunity to see the films newly released and avoid pirates view. Psychologically, this allows you feel special. This opera house fosters bond between types of relationship. However, health wise it has no negative effect. Although, it has few demerits such as once played it can’t be paused irrespective of the reasons and also this platform can be abused by teenagers if not properly managed.
To conclude, although some prefer seeing the film on t heir device, but I prefer going to the cinema especially with my family to enjoy every bit of the moment and bond.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05743243243 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67178045366 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.7124545872 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1666666667 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287729583146 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713268181032 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929558299481 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18739134877 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984209731082 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.