Some people prefer to watch movies on their own smart devices as it can be more convenient and reasonably-priced. However, I agree with those who think that for feeling the full excitement, films should be watched in a cinema.
Watching movies on cell phones or tablets is more convenient and a lot less expensive rather than going to cinemas. Seeing films by mobiles or tablets allows film lovers to decide how they want to sit or to wear. For instance, some are keen on watching movies while they are wearing a loose and comfortable clothes and relax on their beds. Furthermore, seeing films on smartphone is considerably reasonable rather than cinemas. For going cinema, you should pay to commute, ticket, and some expensive snacks from cinemas’ buffet. However, for watching films on phones, should only pay to download them which is reasonably-priced.
On the other hand, for completely enjoying a film you should go cinema because having high technology equipment, cinema offers numerous visual and sound effects which cannot show by cell phones and tablets. As a result, these features can help audience to engage and connect with the film, and feel more thrill than watching it at home with a tiny screen. Furthermore, in cinemas people can watch movies without any disruption as some of them put special equipment to jam the mobile networks, once you enter the hall you cannot receive a call or massages.
In conclusion, I agree with those who think that the thriller that you experience in the cinema cannot be replaced by seeing films on cell phones or tablets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'special equipment'.
Suggestion: special equipment
...hout any disruption as some of them put a special equipment to jam the mobile networks, once you en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97368421053 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7541102961 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9834576567 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248563842064 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101818251419 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470475637397 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17281178331 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128069698946 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.