There is an opinion that the purpose of acquiring knowledge of overseas language is travelling or working whereas according to some other's perspective, it is assumed that there can be some other reasons for this as well. I agree with latter viewpoint.
It is true that it is essential to learn the language of the nation to which we are travelling otherwise it would be challenging to communicate with residents of the corresponding place which in turn would lead to create unwanted circumstances. For instance, at airport, it is embarrassing when a person is unable to understand what the officer sitting at counter is saying. Furthermore, employees face many difficulties at their workplace if they do not have the command on the language as this deficiency is an great obstacle in the path of their success. To cite an example, parul daruv, an employee, working in an international company lost his job because sometimes he misunderstood his customers and made flaws in completing his project. That is why, it is a necessity to be proficient in speaking, listening, writing and reading of a language to get promotion in the company.
Although, learning foreign language is extremely advantageous in travelling and achieving success at work, however other factors cannot be ignored in which knowledge of language becomes beneficial. As some people have the curiosity to explore different cultures and traditions which can be possible with expertise of language. Language plays a important role in understanding lifestyle, social life, art and craft of other countries. For example, chinese literature can only be accessible by learning chinese language.
To sum up, it can be stated that to consider, that acquisition of language will only resolve the purpose of travelling and working,is wrong as it is also helpful in grasping awareness related cultures of other nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ng or working whereas according to some others perspective, it is assumed that there c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'communicating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: communicating
...lling otherwise it would be challenging to communicate with residents of the corresponding pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d on the language as this deficiency is an great obstacle in the path of their suc...
^^
Line 3, column 841, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing, listening, writing and reading of a language to get promotion in the company...
^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...h expertise of language. Language plays a important role in understanding lifesty...
^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , is
...ve the purpose of travelling and working,is wrong as it is also helpful in grasping...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24834437086 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08632897086 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.714953311 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203025170318 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686972683606 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062458434976 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129452604435 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064048007518 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.