some people say that popular tourist destinations are receiving bad effects from travelers. why does this happen and what can be done to resolve this?
Many people arguing that the famous tourist spots are not well preserved or getting destroyed by the people who are visiting them. In this essay I shall talk about some common problems in tourist destinations and I will give some solutions to tackle this matter.
Two of the extreme harms that are caused by tourism, known as vandalism and littering. Many irresponsible tourists are destroying ancient buildings while they are visiting them. For example you can saw a plethora of pictures online from those who were claimed on an ancient piece to take a picture and these led to lots of demolition on these areas. The other most common problem is the amount of the garbages that are left behind by the sightseers on each location. People are not taking responsibility about the litter they are leaving behind while visiting the tourist locations, therefore the amount of the garbages on these premises are getting out of control. People may think one bottle or an empty bag of chips would not cause so much harm, but imagine if every tourist do this harmful action what will happen to these spots.
There are some solutions to tackle these issues. First of all, governments and tourist agencies should take responsibility to educate tourist about their actions and their consequences. In most of the cases, being aware of the negative effects that comes from a small action could prevent the person to do it. Secondly, Governments and the authorities should put some firm rules and penalties for vandalism and littering. Heavy fines not only will reduce such actions, but they can use the income from fines for repairing and maintaining the areas. For example, Canada has some firm policy about those who litter in the tourist areas and fine those actions with $1000 tickets. This simple rule reduced the amount of the garbages on these areas by a large number.
In conclusion, Although there are detrimental effects with increasing tourism but with some education and rules, governments can limit the harmful actions and environmental pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02346041056 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.551494921 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530791788856 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1360639684 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215360162807 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656541496656 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532913961481 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138351327837 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572777225064 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.