Some people say that rich nations should help poor countries with their basic needs like food and education while others oppose the idea and argue that the poor nation themselves should try to improve their condition. Do you agree with the idea that rich and developed nations should help the poor nations?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write no less than 250 words.
These days, dynamics of world have changed. It has become a global village and interaction between different people is becoming more easier day by day. Furthermore, there has always been parity in resources amongst different countries. Some nations are poor and few are rich. This essay will discuss the responsibilities of poorer nations and role wealthy countries can play to ease out the pressure and balance it.
Different states have wide range of responsibilities to fulfil. However, they tend to succeed in few and fail in some, but reason for their failure could be lack of resources on their disposal. All around the globe, taking care of basic needs is responsibility of a nation, whether it is poor or wealthy. However, on numerous occasions, different nations have failed to take care basic of necessities. Moreover, few countries try to take care of this matter by taking grants from different organisations across the globe, such as: World Health Organisation (WHO), UNICEF, UNO and etc. Furthermore, World Bank and Asian Development Bank, have also been seen playing major role, in order to overcome these problems.
While on the other hand, wealthy nations also have an important role to play and on various instances, it has been noted that they have played their role and performed their responsibilities in a great manner. We have seen nations, that have ample resources to provide jobs to people of poor nation and moreover, they have also helped to overcome issues of basic necessities. Furthermore, we have nations such as: Saudi Arabia, Japan, USA and etc, to be part of donor plans of various human rights organisations.
In conclusion, it can be easily said that 'yes', looking after citizen is responsibility of every nation whether they are poor or rich, but if a country is wealthier in terms of resources and have idle resources, than they should be used to help poor countries, to overcome issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...on between different people is becoming more easier day by day. Furthermore, there has alwa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ld Health Organisation WHO, UNICEF, UNO and etc. Furthermore, World Bank and Asian Devel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, in order to overcome these problems. While on the other hand, wealthy nations...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great manner" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...le and performed their responsibilities in a great manner. We have seen nations, that have ample ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... have also helped to overcome issues of basic necessities. Furthermore, we have nations such as: ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05956112853 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83332519237 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548589341693 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5320693261 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19904951596 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759158247431 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822965640952 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131409759879 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197346995287 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.