There are different beliefs concerning what separates being good from being great. In my opinion what makes the difference in any area of life is continues ethical hard work, that is why the phrase '10 percent talent and 90 percent hard work' is so true even though it looks strange when said in this way.
We have all witness amazing talents from different fields of sports and business, from all, the most important to be mentioned are names from football like Cristiano Ronaldo, Lionel Messi, from basketball Michael Jordan, from business Elon Musk and even art Picasso. They are all well known to be great achievers in their areas and are considered great talents from people as they have something different from anyone else. But what makes a talent be considered as such? Researchers say that they have uncommon abilities from eye vision, to fast thinking, and even innate intelligence which differentiate further this individuals. For example Messi can dribble while going in high speed and has a technique beyond any imagination. Ronaldo can score from long distance due to his physicality and so on.
Lets analyse further this cases by saying that what would anyone of them achieve if they only stood faithful to the idea that their talent is all they need to succeed in life. I can say with complete conviction that they would have been good players but they would not have been the great players that are considered to be today without hard training and continuous work ethic mindset. When Picasso was approached by a women in a bar after he was sketching, she asked him to give her the drawing as a gift for her. Instead he responded by saying that with that drawing he could buy all the bar. She remained shocked by saying that he only took few minutes to finish it. He than replayed by saying that he had practiced all his life for that minute.
To conclude having a talent is a gift, but how you nourish it from good to great depends totally on work ethic and mindset.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thical hard work, that is why the phrase 10 percent talent and 90 percent hard wo...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an, from business Elon Musk and even art Picasso. They are all well known to be g...
^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ntelligence which differentiate further this individuals. For example Messi can drib...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e due to his physicality and so on. Lets analyse further this cases by saying th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...mindset. When Picasso was approached by a women in a bar after he was sketching, she as...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...ndset. When Picasso was approached by a women in a bar after he was sketching, she as...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...give her the drawing as a gift for her. Instead he responded by saying that with that d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70487106017 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3813422434 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8389122192 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163037746521 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546120905783 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750357683872 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122538002028 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074954637244 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.