Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are destroying social interactions. To want extent do you agree or disagree.
Due to advancements in technology and with the introduction of internet and smartphones, it has been seen that people especially youngsters, have become hesitant while interacting others. This is mainly due to availability of these services in wide varieties and at cheap rate. I think it has played a crucial role in diverting people from socialising with others.
To begin with, there are a huge varieties of applications available on internet like Netflix for entertainment, Amazon for online shopping, zomato for online food, video games and so on. These applications fulfill the needs of an individual with just one touch. However in the past, people used to take someone else with them for shopping, playing games, etc. which not only provide them active lifestyle, but also improves the bonding between near and dear ones. Furthermore, people are so busy in their hectic schedule so they hardly get time for others, but whenever they get they prefer to utilize on internet. As a result, it impairs the relationships and loss of respect for other members of family.
Moreover, today generation is so influenced by these gadgets that they believe their elders are good for nothing. Thus, they prefer to spend longer hours on phone rather than their family members. It also give birth to anti social behavior in them. Besides this, this kind of lifestyle leads to many problems while interacting others like they lack communication skills, ethics and moral values. These values and skills played a vital role in everyone’s life in real world.
In conclusion, although it cannot be denied that modern technology has made our lives easier and hassle free. But, Over dependence on it will have an adverse impact on the health and bonding of the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'variety'?
Suggestion: variety
...rs. To begin with, there are a huge varieties of applications available on internet l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s of an individual with just one touch. However in the past, people used to take someon...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fer to utilize on internet. As a result, it impairs the relationships and loss of...
^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...ther than their family members. It also give birth to anti social behavior in them. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es this, this kind of lifestyle leads to many problems while interacting others l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09310344828 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68996682545 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644827586207 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9139135905 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841032715468 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252729361845 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275614357255 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505918832537 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221652494268 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.