Some people that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is frequent discussions about whether people convicted of crime should be measured by a single yardstick and given equal sentence or justice should be served based on the nature of the crime. This essay will shed light on both sides of the argument and maintain that punishments should depend on the offender's motives and situation.
One the one side, it is argued that an offence as long as it breaks a law, is a crime and is liable for punitive action - no more and no less than a predetermined sentence - irrespective of the nature of the crime. this clearly suggests that people are often skeptical about the vulnerability of the trial system and they do not want anybody to become victim of a poor judiciary system. Needless to say, there are some instances when innocent people are incriminated and proven guilty deliberately or by error of judgement. In order to avoid partiality and bias in the court procedures, such a provision makes sense.
However, equal sentence means people will be encouraged to commit more serious crimes. it is because a certain law and order prevails in the society only because people fear breaking laws and the consequences that are associated with it. if people don't get chastened by a harsh punishment, committing serious offences will be a commonplace. In addition, there is also a question on ethical consideration if people who commit crime unintentionally and people who commit murders get equal punishment for their wrong doing. Obviously, juvenile delinquency and incidences of rapes and genocides differ in intention and seriousness. What's more, there are some circumstances where taking an offensive action become inevitable and the judge should exercise his discretion to consider the extenuating circumstances when giving the verdict.
In conclusion, although there could be some rare cases of lapses in the court of law on account of human errors in judgement while ruling a sentence, there is a strong reason for the judicial system to have punishments ranging from fines to life sentence based on the nature of crime. I believe such an arrangement deters criminals from reoffending and committing crimes of serious nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are frequent discussions'?
Suggestion: There are frequent discussions
There is frequent discussions about whether people convicted of crime...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ingle yardstick and given equal sentence or justice should be served based on the...
^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rrespective of the nature of the crime. this clearly suggests that people are often ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...couraged to commit more serious crimes. it is because a certain law and order prev...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... that are associated with it. if people dont get chastened by a harsh punishment, co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 630, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...s differ in intention and seriousness. Whats more, there are some circumstances wher...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14606741573 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90803454211 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9397164989 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355795724888 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102069795163 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068310543815 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204944524255 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536636864751 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.