Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that communities can reap benefits of the young brigade who can contribute their unutilized time without being compensated. This in turn will be beneficial for each teenager in their overall development. This essay agrees that this would be a win-win situation for both.
Firstly, teens still are catching up to take a full understanding about the community they live, can get a real time exposure of unique structures of society. When these youngsters will work with their hands and mind involved, such experience cab teach them value of time and money. It will indeed lead them to be self-confident equipped with real work experience they can better relate to many subjects in their studies. To share an instance, it was observed that results of biology subject improved over 53% as compared to last year after students of same class worked on soil conservation practices in local government department.
Secondly, society as a whole can create better future leaders, young minds involved in any kind of community work are inquisitive and perform with keen interest. Working in groups enhances their social bonds and impacts their problem solving ability which eases the task of reaching to consensus and solving any societal emergencies. Parents, become more accountable in franchising their rights and it leads to a healthy community in which relationships are based on trust and respect. To share an instance, after teenagers started helping elders in old age homes, happiness index of New Zealand surged to a new record ranking.
To conclude, it’s a win-win situation for budding teens as well as communities as they utilize the hours in having their skills and fastening better relations in society. This will set a tone for coming generations to align their priorities with nation’s realities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge homes, happiness index of New Zealand surged to a new record ranking. To conc...
^^
Line 4, column 610, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'record'.
Suggestion: record
...iness index of New Zealand surged to a new record ranking. To conclude, it's a win-...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21959459459 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80972034136 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5436047543 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195456329858 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695107565783 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404003347545 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11630802455 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056724509657 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.