Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">It is believed by few people that university students should choose the subject that they like most. On the other hand, many believe that students should study only those subjects that have a bright future. In my opinion, students should concentrate on the subjects that they are passionate about.
Dreaming is natural to every human being so, every child bears a dream from their childhood that what they want to be in the future. It is not necessary to an expert in every subject though it is not also possible. Each adolescent is passionate about a particular subject. If their passion becomes their profession in future then success is definite. For instance, if a teenager finds economics interesting and contiguous his/her study in economics then there is a high possibility that in future he/she can be a profound economist. However, it is also important that parents and teachers also support student's dream. Encouraging by parents and teachers make children more confident that they can face and difficult situation to achieve their goal.
Making students bound to choose subjects that have better future will not helpful either for them, their parents or society. Although many parents do not want to take chance with their children's future and they forcefully entered into studies which have high social acceptance such as, science, technology, and law. Actually, these parents are building castles in the air to thinking that by doing this their children will be successful in life. But unfortunately, these students get demotivate from their beginning of life. To illustrate this, if a student wants to study in business and want to be a chief executive officer in a multinational company but his/her parents decided to make him/her a doctor. That person can never be a good doctor in life.
In conclusion, I would like to recapitulate that every student should feel free to choose subjects to study that they are good at. So, they can show their excellence. </span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... passionate about a particular subject. If their passion becomes their profession ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17325227964 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88750279934 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537993920973 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6744396222 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324343869016 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102284667586 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831359200354 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220430163933 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954196104834 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.