Some people think that children should be studying all the mandatory subjects until the age of ten, while others believe they should have an option to select favourite subjects to study. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your answers including reasons and relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
How to draw a scheme for pupils in the school curriculum has become a matter of debates these days. Opinions are dividing whether students should have options to choose which class to participate or not. I do appreciate those who notion that pupils should pass they mandatory classes since they deeply profound the importance of these subjects in their future; however, my own considered opinion is that it is crucial to pay attention which subject draw the students attention, meaning that they may have excellent grasp of subject. Thus, they will take opportunities of reading that major and making a breakthrough in it if they find their talent by taking up optional classes.
People who reach a unanimous agreement on a fixed schedule for pupils believe that students do not have a predictable view and are not able to make a decision for their future. Thus, this is a pedagogic expert's responsibility to show them a path on behalf of them in order to make a good progress. For instance, primary schools' students are not expected to schedule their curriculum; however, they have to be enforced what to study.
I fundamentally disagreed with this point of view as different students find different subjects more tempting. It can be a good idea to a allow students to take part in one or two favorites courses one optionally. This allowance brought about three positive ramifications. Firstly, the students never play a truant or withdraw from the course since they like to make a useful contribution in their favorite classes. Secondly, they will grantee to achieve a brilliant success because of their tendency, not compelling. Lastly, optional classes May have an inevitable knock-on effect on selecting their future career.
In conclusion, as mentioned above, the pros of optional classes outweigh the drawbacks while this permission is limited only to one or two classes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a notion'.
Suggestion: who is a notion
...rticipate or not. I do appreciate those who notion that pupils should pass they mandatory ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to pay attention which subject draw the students attention, meaning that they may have e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...their future. Thus, this is a pedagogic experts responsibility to show them a path on b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good progress'.
Suggestion: good progress
...path on behalf of them in order to make a good progress. For instance, primary schools students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...more tempting. It can be a good idea to a allow students to take part in one or t...
^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...more tempting. It can be a good idea to a allow students to take part in one or two fav...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ompelling. Lastly, optional classes May have an inevitable knock-on effect on select...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10322580645 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82338974579 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9191501676 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188707001732 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605781535747 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538622389839 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104984703251 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552369828031 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.