Some people think that children should receive formal training at school on how to be good parents in the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Needless to say that raising children is a daunting task, and imparting training on parenthood will surely ripe better results. However, I am not in concord with giving knowledge of childcare to young children. This essay examines the fact closely.
There are numerous arguments against the incorporation of parenting as a subject in the academic curriculum. Firstly, the purpose behind the learning of being a better parent would be futile as children are immature and naïve. They may not grasp the crux of the subject. What is more, they would compare the teachings with their parent’s behavior, and if found not according to the chapter, then children may ingrain negativity for them. Consequently, the child may become rebellious or alienates, overall impacting family bondings.
Another reason that goes against the statement is the age of youngsters is too early to educate with such a critical subject. Evidently, a lot of couples mutually decide to have a baby at the start of their thirties when they become financially and mentally capable for the child. Hence, the strategies of parenting today may not be right by the time they become parents. The world is constantly upgrading, and so is the dynamics of the society.
Furthermore, schools have to teach children subjects such as English, science, mathematics, and history so that they can have all-together different aspirations. Perhaps, they can inspire themselves to become doctors, engineers, and other professionals. Firmly, an extra subject in their curriculum will be a burden on them and on the teaching faculty, too.
To sum up, nurturing young ones is a worthwhile job, and requires special skills, nonetheless, learnings of parenthood in schools would not serve the purpose instead of when imparted to couples before having a baby would be beneficial for their future role.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, while, such as, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27946127946 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87024348782 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599326599327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7288226596 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149999059447 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455389630213 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340136346027 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809107319297 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251440178902 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.