Some people think that cooking food at home is wastage of time They think that the fast food restaurants have made modern living easy and less stressful To what extent do you agree

In this modern world that some people prefer to have their meal in restaurants rather than wasting of their time to cooking food at home. I partly agree with this point of view, I believe that cooking at home is not that that difficult compared to dining in restaurants.

On the one hand, cooking at home is healthier and convenient. Nowadays, supermarkets provided a variety of ready to cook products in order to make cooking more variety. People are more health conscious about their everyday meals. They tend to focus on the quality of ingredients and the cooking method that can promote their immune systems and body strength. In addition, food safety and personal hygiene is another problems that people choice to cook at home because they believe that is the only way to make sure the meal is safe to eat.

On the other hand, fast food restaurants are the convenient options for people who have no time to prepare their meal at home. In this rapid society, people spend the most of time on their careers or businesses, therefore they hardly to prepare their own meals after work. They prefer to eat in a restaurant or buy a takeaway meal for their daily diet because they can have more spare time to have a rest after work.

In conclusion, our daily meal is important for our body’s strength and energy. I believe that cooking food at home is a healthier way for people to maintain, while eating in a restaurants is another options for someone who is needs more time to enjoy their meal after work.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a restaurant' or simply 'restaurants'?
Suggestion: a restaurant; restaurants
...for people to maintain, while eating in a restaurants is another options for someone who is n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65671641791 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39530151955 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473880597015 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2229895568 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274195162157 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117995778091 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820402233724 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192222592818 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054498061926 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.