Some people think that the development of technology helps to reduce crime, while other people think it encourages crime. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Some people believe that the advancement in science and technology has aided in the decline of crime rate while others argue that this has only made criminals smarter and has only helped them. I believe that though technology has helped both sides of the scale, it is playing a vital role in improving the security of the masses.
To begin with, terms like cybercrime, data loss or phishing are all modern-day crimes where an act is committed without physical presence and mostly leaving the victim oblivion to the crime. The technological advancement has made it possible to loot a person from another part of the continent by only moving a mouse. Consequently, this has left people prone to losing their hard-earned money and privacy on the click of a link.
On the other side, the advancement in technology has also helped people to feel safe. Sitting thousands of miles away, a person can see his dear ones from his mobile that works in sync with the security cameras. In addition to this, the constant connectivity from mobile has also helped people to always stay connected with their family and avoid any unwanted situation as help is always a call away. Apart from people, advancement has also helped enforcement agencies to deal with crimes better through online monitoring and surveillance.
Therefore, though the crimes have gone hi-tech these days so has the government and communities. The people are relying more on technology to increase their safety. For Instance, today a greater number of shop owners and RWAs are installing security cameras to keep themselves safe. In some cases of extreme importance, the governments use the advance techs like Drone to keep a close eye on the suspects. The 24x7 vigilance has helped law enforcement agencies to maintain a tight noose around criminals.
To conclude, though the advancement of technology has introduced us to the new age crimes it has also provided much sharper teeth to the agencies responsible for law and order. It has aided in monitoring public and private spaces without the need for physical presence.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, so, therefore, while, apart from, as to, for instance, in addition, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06358381503 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6869350135 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557803468208 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1491726647 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242326829081 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789922802958 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731114384574 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134701757205 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687937745711 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.