Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police force or military force, such as the army, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs. What is your opinion?
The world today is witnessing an emergence of women power from world leader to space technology. But the only role that divides opinion is the entry of women in police forces or military. While some people believe that the entry into combative roles should be limited to men, others believe in providing equal role to women in every field. I believe that the women should not enter war scenes but can be part of police force and this essay will elaborate on my reasons.
To begin with, women can provide decisive role as a police officer. There have been many examples of women who rose to ranks while serving in male-dominated police forces. These women became inspirations for many other girls and stood as a bright example in a patriarchal society like India. For Instance, Dr. Kiran Bedi, was the first women IPS officer in India, became a role model for women empowerment and was eulogized for her role in transforming one of the most notorious jails in India, the Tihar Jail.
However, the role of women in army has been restricted to provide the backend support. This results from an apprehension, that women have physical constraints and their role in defense services cannot be at par with their male counterparts. Additionally, women serving on border along the enemy lines are more prone to war crimes. Consequentially, though the women enjoy greater autonomy in naval and air forces, their participation in territorial forces is limited. This difference between male and female participation is not an epitome of an orthodox society but in line with the nature’s way of differentiating between the two sexes.
In conclusion, I believe that there exist certain qualification criteria for an entry into every field and these criteria’s make women unsuitable for combative roles along borders. However, this restriction does not make the egalitarian view of the society apocryphal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10223642173 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86140007104 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55910543131 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0568926839 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360706332313 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123232904773 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759198979911 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217895277512 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844828662021 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.