Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this.
Discuss both the sides and give your own opinion.
Natural resources are highly polluted by continuous exploitation by corporation and individuals. To which, a few people believe that culprits, who are major contributor to pollution, should be imposed with tax while others asserts that it can be controlled by other more convenient ways. In my opinion, Tax duties to certain extent should go hand in hand with other sustainable way, such as non-conventional energy sources.
To begin with, enterprises, which discharge their industrial waste in to water and air, are the biggest responsible factor to elevate various kinds of pollution. For instance, Lakes in Bengaluru are so polluted by surrounding industries that water is totally covered by foam which continuously catches fire. Besides, it requires enormous amount of resources in order to process and purify this natural resources that can create burden government budget and eventually on common tax payers. Thus, levy of tax as a compensation on companies can be fruitful not only for averting pollution but to improve the quality of existing polluted resources.
However, there are other means which are considered to be more effective, such as discouraging usage of non-biodegradable material, especially plastic and polythene. Furthermore, masses can be motivated to rely more on public transport instead of personal vehicle as a mode of transportation for their regular commute. In this way, carbon emission, which is key factor for global warming, can be controlled. For example, 20% of carbon monoxide is contributed only by cars running on the street. As well as, instead of relying on conventional source, such as coal and fossil, more research should be carried out to commercialize other pollution-free sources, namely solar energy and wind energy. Hence, general awareness and non-conventional source can assist in reduction of pollution with great amount.
In conclusion, although Tax can restrict corporation from emitting pollutant in the environment, other ways are more sustainable and suitable. Thus, it needs equal effort from public, government and businesses to preserve the Mother Nature for our continuous existence on the planet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5421686747 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1493927508 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599397590361 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2614782064 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1566152236 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551935840969 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445866403837 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103634540462 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272232651946 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.