It is commonly believed that ecosystem issues must be resolved at the global stage. Although, this view is favored by some, while others have strong counter-argument that these problems must be addressed by individual nations. In my perspective, environmental threats such as pollution and global warming must be handled globally and change required to counter these challenges must be implemented nationally. This essay will delve into both aspects with relevant examples in support of my view.
To commence with, mutual co-operation among the nations is mandatory to resolve these issues. The developed countries can foster the trend of benevolence by supporting the underdeveloped nations by imparting the scientific research to them, which can be helpful for them to switch their industries from pollution-causing resources such as petroleum products to the clean sources of energy namely solar energy. For Instance, a recent survey reveals that the air pollution level in African countries is reduced by 40 percent with the technology transferred by united nations. Therefore, to curb these problems successfully combined endeavors are needed to be taken at the international level.
On the other hand, the determination of an individual country is imperative. The industrial and transportation system is the backbone of a developing country's economy, so any modification in them can thwart their growth and development. However, this transition will have a short term adverse effect and higher future gains. Because it will be aidful in reducing the import of petroleum products consequently boost the economy. For example, in the first quarter of last year, the GDP growth rate of India is shrunk by 3 percent due to the changes in the energy sources in the industrial sector despite that the annual growth rate was the highest in their history due to the reduced imports. Hence, the vision and approach of the policymakers of each state will play a vital role in preserving our environment.
In conclusion, I strongly opine that the efforts taken at both the national and international scale are required for the conservation of our earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...adverse effect and higher future gains. Because it will be aidful in reducing the impor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36283185841 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0794086641 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589970501475 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3566123306 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.2 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169619313264 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535188327755 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420275390969 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950290544468 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06418316403 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.