In this modern era, many cities in the world are suffering from traffic jams. A section of society believes that to reduce the traffic-related problems government should spend money on the construction of train and subway lines. Although some support this view, others have strong counter-argument that constructing more and broad roads is the effective measure to minimize the traffic overcrowding. In my perspective, building train and subway lines is the ideal way to curb traffic problems. This essay will delve into both aspects with relevant examples in support of my view.
To begin with, enhancing public transportation like metro and local train system can provide a viable solution to traffic congestion. As more people will prefer them as they are an economical and faster way of daily commutation rather than driving their car. This step can potentially decrease the number of vehicles on the road which will help to solve the traffic problems. For instance, a study carried out by the Indian Government reveals that instances of traffic jam have registered a sharp decline since the inception of the metro and local railway in India. Hence, this is an efficient way to control the traffic choking.
On the other hand, others advocate that more and widened roads can resolve these problems and has a strong reason to support. First and foremost, constructing the new and broaden roads will help manage the traffic because it will accommodate a higher number of vehicles and also provide alternative routes to reach a destination. However, this approach has failed in many metro cities in India due to the exponential rise of the population. For example, research has shown that despite constructing the new and broad roads by Delhi Government, the traffic-related issues remained unsolved until the metro come into existence. Therefore, the subway network is a better approach than constructing the new roads.
In conclusion, constructing more roads might not be as practical as estimated. So, I strongly opine that constructing the underground railway system is an acceptable solution to traffic problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ceptable solution to traffic problems.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28908554572 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90872210471 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548672566372 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6344281279 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.470588235 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302078544482 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924151630518 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747353640616 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170450862138 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103239184438 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.