It is true that the emergence of GM food has been achieving many breakthroughs in the farming development process. Nonetheless, this step has also provoked a wave of controversy amongst scientists and users about whether its actual impacts on human society are positive or negative. The essay will discuss both sides of the problem before arriving at the conclusion.
On the one hand, the effectiveness in Gm crops is proved through producing numerous new kinds of agricultural commodities, including cattle, vegetables, and fruits. These newly altered genes could have the superior features that allowed the later generation to grow and reproduce faster or survive in extreme weather conditions, help increasing the productivity as well as the quality of products. For example, some vegetables have longer shelf lives which are much convenient in shipping to remote areas or countries suffering from disasters. As a matter of fact, genetically modified planting progress has put a milestone in biological research all over the world, leading to other significant discoveries that primarily make it a thriving industry.
On the other hand, it is admitted that genetically engineering food is a relatively new practice, little is known about the long-term effects and safety. Some people believe that GM foods are more potential to trigger allergic reactions or even the risk of cancer. However, the authorities have set the guidelines and appropriate laws for GM food manufacturers to put these goods in consumption.
In summary, there has been a hot-debated topic of developing genetically modified engineering but I am optimistic about the prospects of this field as well as the way which scientists monitor its adverse effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to increase' or 'increase'.
Suggestion: to increase; increase
...ive in extreme weather conditions, help increasing the productivity as well as the quality...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sumption. In summary, there has been a hot-debated topic of developing genetica...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, for example, in summary, as a matter of fact, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42066420664 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06365966437 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649446494465 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5437847553 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.545454545 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1818181818 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138587952051 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456106604654 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321261077585 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747187175509 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00624172780035 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.