Some people think that government funding should not be used for supporting Art and Culture,
while others think that supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recent days, people are getting increasingly aware of public funds utilization. Consequently, there are open-ended debates everywhere on allocating these funds for activities like Art and Culture. This essay will delineate both the views and provides an opinion.
As the modern world is facing multiple global concerns like climate change and poverty, few citizens believe in addressing these life-threatening issues rather than spending on Cultural Activities. Moreover, as most of the government's revenue comes in the form of direct taxes from hard-working professionals and businesses; these citizens consider that this money to be streamlined in augmenting the quality of life and Infrastructure.
However, owing to the reduced global restrictions and increased co-operation among nations, the world is currently transforming into a single place. Thus, there is a need to preserve the culture which is unique to the realm and its people. Hence, few personalities believe that the administration needs to encourage Art and Culture by funding and increasing people's awareness. Besides, fostering art is proven to be beneficial for humans in many ways. For example, listening to music for some time a day will help lessen psychic anxiety and renews one's productivity. Cultivating culture will make oneself work as part of a community, further reinforcing the nation. With this, tourism and the economy will blossom by supporting local crafts and arts.
To conclude, Art and Culture are an integral part of a nation and its people. Hence, the government should increase the appreciation of art and its culture among people. However, the allocation of public funds for supporting these is dependent on the specific nation, as it has both perks and impediments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...al Activities. Moreover, as most of the governments revenue comes in the form of direct tax...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... help reduce mental stress and improves ones productivity. Promoting culture will ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42066420664 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98394189965 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5944202668 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308309639641 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987346504961 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528968756955 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177346546116 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074004498013 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.