Some people think that the government should knock down old buildings and make way for the new buildings.
Do you agree or disagree?
Few individuals ponder that the government should demolish old buildings and create revamped one. I completely agree to the statement because it will cut peril to the lives of the people as well as boost the infrastructure.
Every construction done by human has shelf-life and it can not survive beyond that. There are plethora of societies and government offices which were built a long time ago, are in bad condition today. Moreover, cracking down of existing weak buildings will avoid future disaster which might happen with their sudden fall. Apart from this, constructing new will create work opportunities for various sections of the society as well as strengthen the infrastructure of the nation. Beside this, new premises will be built with recent technology providing a longer life in comparison to old once. In addition to this, they will be equipped with modern facilities like water proofing , gas pipeline so on.
Secondly, knocking down old buildings provides an option that new are built in planned and designated areas, therefore, controlling congestion and pollution. Undoubtedly, it will create financial burden on the government but at the same time it is taxpayers money which is being invested on them. However, government should deploy engineers for evaluating every tower before dismantling and necessary precautions must be taken so that environment is not affected.
To conclude, I vehemently advocate the notion that such old buildings must be destroyed. Therefore, replacing them with modern because they will have latest facilities as well as minimize unforeseen contingencies which might occur from old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Few individuals ponder that the government should demoli...
^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th modern facilities like water proofing , gas pipeline so on. Secondly, knock...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...option that new are built in planned and designated areas, therefore, controlling...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e notion that such old buildings must be destroyed. Therefore, replacing them wit...
^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the latest'.
Suggestion: have the latest
...cing them with modern because they will have latest facilities as well as minimize unforese...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tingencies which might occur from old.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4431372549 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9391513809 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639215686275 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2196006 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186909166173 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662547089286 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513469872115 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124484555258 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496154539226 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.