Some people think that the government should spend more money on public service rather than wasting money on the arts. To what extent do you agree?
Many believe that the authorities should allocate more budget for public services, even if it is cut off from the one that is allocated for the arts. I firmly believe that this should not be done as the preservation of old items is important.
To begin with, museums in our are already struggling to get funds from the government. So, further reduction in the amount that is used for renovation and maintenance will have a huge negative impact on the smooth running o them. A recent article in The Tribune has highlighted the plight of museums across the country and how the buildings are in poor condition because of the shortage of staff for cleaning and security. If the current scenario continues the few remaining museums will be shut down as thefts are common in buildings which showcases old items like painting or weapons. With the government reluctance to hire employees in the tourism department due to the fiscal condition of the country.
On the other hand, public services are already receiving a lot of funds from the finance ministry. It is just about money management that is required, as the public money is spent on projects which are not required. For example, the bullet train project which is a pipeline is a total waste of money as the exorbitant amount will be charged from passengers in the future. Because the fair of the bullet train will be equivalent to the cost of air tickets of the same destination.
In conclusion, the maintenance of art museums is already in limbo due to insufficient funds and a further reduction in them is not a wise decision. Rather the administration should hire officers at a higher level so that they can use money allocated for public services for services that are actually needed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... charged from passengers in the future. Because the fair of the bullet train will be eq...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...duction in them is not a wise decision. Rather the administration should hire officers...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81395348837 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71738458496 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528239202658 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9226942188 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154604516015 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513018467267 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616708150716 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983655452043 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530519269664 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.