ittering in cities is an increasing problem that needs to be dealt with. Some people think that steeper fines are the best way to deal with the problem. To what extent do you agree?
People, especially in cities, usually throw waste on the streets and the government should ensure that nobody should dispose of waste on roads. Many believe that authorities should issue challans of bigger amounts to tackle this menace. In my opinion, it would work up to a certain extent.
People littering on roads is a big problem and hiking the rate of penalty will definitely bring change in pedestrian's habit of throwing waste on roads. As of now, people are aware of mere challan amounts and if they know the penalty is a big sum, it will work. Moreover, it is seen that most of us never do things which cost them big. lastly, some times strict measures are needed for bringing positive changes and in this case, hefty fines can work that way.
But, the steeper fine rates will not only stop this prevalent habit of city residents. Therefore, the authorities and locals should work together to make city roads cleaner. Like, installing bins on the sides of streets will ensure that passersby will not have to struggle to find a place to throw waste. Secondly, people should be taught about ill-effects of garbage thrown in open, so that they change their habits. Big signboards mentioning the health hazards related to pollution on sides of the streets can also play a vital role in making urban areas beautiful.
In conclusion, the suggestion of hiking the amount for the crime related to polluting city roads can bring positive results. But launching an awareness drive among locals will do the remaining job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...us never do things which cost them big. lastly, some times strict measures are needed ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s case, hefty fines can work that way. But, the steeper fine rates will not onl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87692307692 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40556553894 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0486000896 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113749409856 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382934999523 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331022385942 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639562321948 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344554005987 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.