Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Earnings of superstars are always hot topics of discussions, in addition with their specially designed outfits, rather than the public work they do.
This leads to negative impact on youngsters, as they blindly follow their favourite movie star. I completely agree with the above statement due to many reasons.
To begin with, in modern world most of us own smartphones and when we open browser news related to celebities occupy most of the space. Naturally, teens who read these news will eventually check the headline related to the star they love and most of these are about fashion or wealth of that popular person. As a result the young people try to copy their fashion sense by wasting plenty of money. For instance, It is common to notice younsters wearing the same outfits which are worn by actors in their movies or real life.
Moreover, instead of highlighting thier social work several new portals only highlight materialist stuff like luxury cars owned by celebrities. This makes a long lasting impact on young people mind and they will never work for the welfare of the society as their role models are rich people who are famous for their family name or good looks. A recent study has proven this fact, and suggested that the news channels should highlight social work done by known personalities.
In conclusion, the young people should follow any personalty who has done some good for community, also the editors of news sites should highlight the community work done by stars rather than their earnings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...of the space. Naturally, teens who read these news will eventually check the headline rela...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...shion or wealth of that popular person. As a result the young people try to copy t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97276264591 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43720201681 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622568093385 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1996435691 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.181818182 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230836284809 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083851894713 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584882159212 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126113549725 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260027214783 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.