Some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people like the homeless and the unemployed. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a commonly held belief that the government should provide care for homeless and unemployed people. In my opinion, I am opposed to this notion.
To begin with, the first reason why the government should not take care of this population portion of society is that it requires a substantial amount of national budget. Since the government’s money mostly come from residents’ taxes, any means of support from the government means that they are sharing money from the country’s contributors to others without full consent. This may bring forth a social unrest from the competent part of the society.
In addition, the underlying cause of the high rate of homeless and jobless people is the lack of available jobs on the market. Providing care, therefore, will not solve this issue in the long term. Instead, the authority could assist these citizens by investing more money in companies to create more job vacancies. This is a much better method that indirectly, yet, effectively aid disadvantaged people.
Another reason is that frequently receiving support from the government will make individuals lazier in finding a job. When people are taken care of for a long time, they will completely rely on the source of support, which means they will keep asking for materials instead of seeking for an occupation to improve their own situation. As a consequence, the issue of unemployment cannot be solved leading to an increase of people living on the streets due to monetary matters.
In conclusion, I believe that the government should not take care of the homeless and the unemployed directly. Instead, focusing on other aspects may indirectly and greatly ameliorate this concerning social problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24460431655 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9191971716 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8151448564 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190863217027 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672953955711 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715025920126 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110050075928 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025219838783 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.