Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts, and that this money could be spend elsewhere.
To what extend do you agree with this view?
Art is included of seven parts. The traditional subdivision of the arts is, being architecture, sculpture, painting, literature, music performance and cinema. Some individuals believe that, leadership is throwing out money on the arts and instead of, they can spend money on the others important things, while others think differently. In their opinion, art is consequence of culture of every civilization and leaders of every country should spend money on the arts. This essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides, and extend my partial support to the latter view before arriving at conclusion.
Art in this sense is communication; it allows people from different cultures and different times to communicate with each other by images, sounds and stories, and it is often vehicle of social change. Researchers have been interested in the relationship between art and the human brain; they believe that, viewing contemporary visual art had positive direct effect on the personal lives of human and of course on their behavior on society. Moreover, in some person opinion, authorities not only should spend money on the art, but also they should allocate ministry just for arts and art related, because however arts in society thrives, that society will be growth in culture, economy and social subjects. Furthermore, the art emanated from each nation culture and spending large money on it, is the best investment and also it will be returned very soon in every society.
On the other hand, many people believe, except arts in society many other things are that they are more important than arts and administration should allocate budget for them, such as health insurance, public transportation or so on. In addition, some individuals have an idea that art is inherent in human body and every person may improve their skills on it without any support from government. They think, art should rise in private sectors. For instance, in private school or non-government university with personal expense of artists.
At the conclusion, in my opinion, the art is playing key role in society, and also many researches show that as much as attention and money paying for art is less. It is a certified investment for every government and society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, of course, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17663043478 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77385761964 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4509204286 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175790882228 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650881129185 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492762716366 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117094565961 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744000018419 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.