Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Essay topics:

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

It is argued that spending money on the arts by the government is not prolific for a nation, and they could be used on other developments. While I accept that other developments are essential for a society, I completely disagree with the idea that the government should stop funding on the arts for them.

People will lead a happy life if the government help them to reduce the health risk and stress from their lifestyle. The various developments such as medical research, infrastructure could ensure their quality of life. For instance, In Bangladesh, the maternal mortality rates has dropped by 49% within a decade because of the government measuring steps on medical sectors. This could mitigate the childbirth related complications for a nation. In addition, the comfortable and congestion free transport systems could reduce our daily life hassle, and helps us to get work-life balance.

However, I would argue that the government should not eliminate their budgets from the arts for the above developments. Arts have a mythological value. They can express our traditions, cultures by paintings, sculptures, and monuments which are the evidence of civilization. A recent documentary on BBC shows that many ancient inscriptions contain the proof of extraterrestrial activities on our primitive structures which could define the way of their surviving on MARS or other planets. Hence, we might find our new home on other planets. In addition, practicing the arts such as music, paintings could enhance our children’s creativity because they have to use their imagination to perform and interpret them.

In conclusion, though the potential benefits of other developments are significant, I do not believe that the government should remove the financial support from the arts for these progresses.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38732394366 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10734199772 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4570943213 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151641749484 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542639766631 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473845206598 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960676187761 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450749109376 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.