Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
People are arguing that central authorities should not spend budget on the arts; however, they should allocate this fund to somewhere else. While I understand the government should consider other factors to spend their fund, I believe art is also significant.
On the one hand, there are several other factors such as education, health infrastructures, and so on important than arts. These are also valid and essential factors to be consider for society’s development. If individuals do not receive better basic facilities, community fall into backward class, and they struggle to survive in the nation. For example, Some African nations are still under poverty as they do not have basic amenities, whereas governments are spending money to historic arts.
On the contrary, art is a great form of human expression which can highly influence the society. First and foremost, Actors portray with various characters in different movies which having social messages to these portrayals can significantly impact the human beings. Consequently, passing these social messages to public will create better living society. Therefore, central governments should keep continue organising the different plays at community hall.
In addition, some artists such as painters, and writers also require support from government because of less popularity. To explain, these artists are usually less popular, this is because of less awareness in public. Nevertheless, they do not receive great audiences as compared to different arts. If government organise some events like art exhibition or art gallery for them to express their arts at national level, these artists will receive fame and popularity which will eventually benefit the nation with pride.
In conclusion, to reiterate that providing fund to other fields is essential, but promoting art is also important as it benefits people and nation with pride and popularity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56802721088 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81727324783 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7155435096 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174349415096 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529173843569 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325686953317 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896741395008 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265441816739 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.