Some people think high end technology can prevent and cut down the rate of committing crime? Do you agree or disagree?
The use of technology in various fields has brought remarkable influence both positive and negative. According to some, technological advancement also helped to curb the crime rates. In my opinion, I strongly disagree that hi-tech tools have controlled the crime ratio as even the conventional crimes are increasing and now criminals have adopted new ways of committing crimes which includes cybercrimes.
To start with, crime ratios are increasing at an alarming rate. Despite, of vigilant camera surveillance on streets and public places still people are threatening for their life and loss of valuables either it is UK or Canada. Evident of this can be seen where Imran Farooq was killed in London just outside his residential territory. Though, CCTV footages were available but neither criminal was sent behind the bars nor crime was prevented. Similarly, another example was documented in Quebec, attack on church in 2018. Hence, it is agreed that high tech tools were ineffective in controlling crime worldwide.
In addition to convention crimes such as murder, snatching and suicidal attacks. A sharp increase in various cyber crimes have also noticed due to technology. For instance, ATM card hacking in one of the largest bak of Pakistan that is Habib Bank is the most obvious example of cyber crime. Almost 2.4 billion of Pakistani Rupees have been gambled. Therefore, seen in this light it is agreed that technology has not helped in decreasing the crime instead figures are swelling.
To conclude, crime ratios are elevating despite of advanced technologies either it is pertinent to conventional crimes or cyber crimes. It is recommended that in order to control the situation, governing bodies ought to work for paramount cause of crime rather to rely on technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of crime rather to rely on technology.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28771929825 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81211379483 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645614035088 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.215705441 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203260377853 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619459628184 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461794832302 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119210516693 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030015894925 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.