Some people think that it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them. Others believe it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with you. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them. Others believe it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with you. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Friendship has always been one of the cornerstones in people’s lives. However, while some think that it is beneficial that individuals have the same views as their friends, I contend with those who argue that it is of paramount importance for people to have friends with some variant views.

On the one hand, it can be argued that a successful friendship can only be established between individuals who often share the same beliefs. This is important because if people have many mutual ideas, they are likely to have fewer conflicts through their discussions. This, in turn, would allow friends to maintain a long last relationship, as they frequently enjoy convenient interactions. Conversely, when individuals possess adverse political opinions, for example, they are more likely to get into serious disagreements, which might end their friendship. The argument goes that if friends always have similar thoughts, their friendship could be more relaxing and appropriate.

Nevertheless, I believe that variant opinions among friends often lead to productive friendship. This is because different views allow people to broaden their horizons and develop their thoughts usuall, which result in better analysis. In other words, expressing ideas is a vital catalyst in healthy arguments. In addition, having friends with variant opinions provide people with the skill of accepting others. This is influential because when people get used to deal with variation of mindsets, they can accept others’ cultures, thoughts and believes. As a result, they would have better appreciatan and tolerant towards other people.

In conclusion, although similar opinions between friends can be more convenient and less conflictual, I believe that variant views are more advantageous in terms of being more productive and more informative.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62365591398 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95066772966 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7374471788 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302036244941 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106786703827 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848786797723 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193635922538 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880197207715 0.056905535591 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.