Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field, as long as they are playing well.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sportsperson are always been looked up for and their each every action are taken into consideration by followers. A section of society believes, that unless until the players are giving their best performance other factors like their behaviour should not be judged. In my perspective, such practice has many consequences and I do not agree with the assertion. In this essay, I will explain what will be the drawbacks of such behaviour.
Athletes are the public figure and for individual they are the role models and if they are rude this represents negativity among others. Moreover, due to this, they might also lose the status symbol and ramification of misconduct can impede the fame and career. For instance, according to one of the interviews on Bloomberg TV, the sportsperson not only get judge by their success rate but also how they treat their mates and public is also essential because society prefers to see someone who is humble and generous. Therefore, though the player is excellent in their game at the same time if their behaviour is preposterous are not expectable by the public as a result their fan following gets eradicate.
Secondly, whether they are playing or not they do not have right to misconduct with anyone it is unethical. Players not only represent themselves but they also represent the country because of which the entire nation can face the humiliation in front of others. For example, a recent article in The Times says that the sportsperson from Chain is considered to be aggressive in nature, because of which people do not watch their match since it is against the ethical boundaries. Hence, such an image which is created by them has become an endurance for a country as well.
To conclude, it is vital that an athlete should have a down to earth nature because they are been observed by millions as an idol and unfair behaviour is considered to lose for their professional life. Furthermore, the countries respect is also entitled to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill be the drawbacks of such behaviour. Athletes are the public figure and for i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91369047619 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73343126328 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0274977643 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149442878207 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564213592315 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049096725698 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089842824435 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326695596345 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.