Some people believe that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned. Others feel that we should be able to talk wherever we like. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People these days are reliable on cell phones for their day to day conversations. A stratum of society feels mobile phones are creating nuisances in the public area and should be prohibited the use in such places. Despite its drawback, there are some who oppose this notion of restricting people where to talk. In my point of view, we cannot refrain to peoples’ talking habits.
On the one hand, talking over the cell phone in public-space is annoying since there are people who behave carelessly when they are communicating on mobile. In other words, they do not even pay attention that their conversation is making someone uncomfortable. For example, if a person is talking to their friends or loved once their private talks are heard by others and which is not good etiquette. Moreover, in a crowded place, it creates more noise pollution due to people’s loud talking habits. Hence, to control the issue banning the use of cell phone is needed.
On the other hand, as per my perspective although, it is disturbing and distracting it is impossible to impose a law on usages of the phone and where it can be used. This is because such devices are counted has the point to connect people with each other if any emergence arises, because of some negligent it cannot be restricted to all. For instance, many old people are in touch with their families with the use of cellular phones since it is convenient and deter the unwanted situation.
In conclusion, some are in support of prohibition on cell phones in public places due to fewer irresponsible behaviour also became noisier in-crowd. However, inculcating a restriction is not possible because some use the devices to be connected with a family member so that they can avoid any unwanted circumstance and I agree with the same.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74981892537 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6940511169 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2771232583 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924342367302 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048272933285 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163640560614 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548604575899 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.