Some people think it is important to spend a lot of money on a wedding celebration, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Marriages are made in heaven and considered to be one of the most significant chapters of one's life. There is a school of thought that says that excessive spending is essential for a marriage ceremony. This essay will analyze the contrasting opinions, which are for and against materialistic ways to celebrate an event.
To commence with, on one hand, a lot of the parents opine that the marriage ceremony of their children should be one of the most memorable days in their lives. Therefore, to make it an unforgettable event they spend a huge amount of money on the preparations and the celebrations of the same. A good example of increased spending is contemporary big fat weddings, which is a mandate these days for a couple to start their journey together. Quintessentially these snobby ceremonies are believed to enhance the social status of the host family. Thus, spending an enormous part of wealth is considered valuable.
On the other hand, others argue that the careless use of bank balance is not a wise way of organizing functions. These spendthrift habits of some can create pressure on society and set high expectations from other hosts to arrange lavish programmes too. There is ample evidence that a majority of people take loans just to treat their relatives and friends for their wedding ceremonies. Thus, creating a financial burden to commemorate nuptials is illogical as excessive materialism can harm the moral values of the society.
To recapitulate, there are favorable and unfavorable consequences of shelling out enormous wealth on marriages. In my opinion, such events must be celebrated considering the affordability of the organizer, consequently, burning a hole in the pocket just to impress others is wasting precious resources, which if invested intelligently could result in securing the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...one of the most significant chapters of ones life. There is a school of thought that...
^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...rs is wasting precious resources, which if invested intelligently could result in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20945945946 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06657770671 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7228849442 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105660958111 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032119102451 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270220870189 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556296313789 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280477033686 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.