Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
There are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society believes that they should choose a companion who is always in accord with them, others think it could be better to have a friend someone like who has a disagreement view at sometimes. However, I do think that both notions are equally valued in a friendship circle.
On the one hand, a companion who has similar thoughts and personality will make them feel confident and satisfied in their friendship. Imagine a person who is introverted and likes watching a movie at a home rather than outside. For instance, if this person had an extrovert friend who interests in go the cinema, both would enjoy the movie as well as their friendship time. Plus, there would be a conflict of interest that would arise and it can lead to break a friendship as long as they do not meet each other's requirements and interests. Thus, the similarity in companions can cause a life-long friendship.
On the other hand, many people tend to have a friend with a discord viewpoint. This is because such a friend not only notices a weak area of his or her companion but also could help to improve them. Additionally, the more variety of ideas people confront, the more cautiously they will behave. For example, when someone shares an idea by delivering a speech on any topic, indubitably a friend with a diverse option can make a better comment than identical minded ones.
In my profound opinion, although getting a friend with similar kind of views and habits can cause a long-life friendship, a companion who has diverse options could be helpful to his or her friend in any form of discussion, problem or situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... the cinema, both would enjoy the movie as well as their friendship time. Plus, there woul...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79584775087 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76755616118 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2003022325 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300686760436 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102939619366 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943839228632 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192873954388 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835903430403 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.