some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them. other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People thinking behavior is changes from each other. Therefor, some people think choosing freids with same opinions are better than having friend, who are disagreeing sometime. I believe that, having disagreement is much beneficial than same tone thinking pattern friends to have good life,
Disagreement creates room to open arguments, which will end up with considerable valuable thought on the table. On the other hand, it will create people to think out of the box and learn on what is out side world. The thinking patter is directly influence with the first level social community. If your good friend sometime having different thoughts create this and can gain the coorect outcomes with them. However, need to clearly identify on attitude of other party, who is not a negative minded person for whatever situation.
When considering the same tone thinking pattern friends, they will come up with same opinion. This will make comfortable zone on taking the conclusion without any argument for each and every case. Nevertheless, the real outcome may be a disaster. Because he/she is not a coacher or mentor as always lineup with your side. Moreover, never creates value to your thinking behavior and will not uplift the critical thinking attitude on your own.
Therefore, considering the all above facts, I strongly believe that, having different kind of thinking friends are more helpful than others, even though sometimes they may disagree. However, finding friend with different opinion should be chosen carefully by eliminating born negative minded person, who always disagreeing to the opinion. Then it will end up with the another stage than having best outcome on consulting them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ions are better than having friend, who are disagreeing sometime. I believe that, having disagr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nking pattern friends to have good life, Disagreement creates room to open argume...
^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
...ink out of the box and learn on what is out side world. The thinking patter is directly ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the best'.
Suggestion: having the best
...will end up with the another stage than having best outcome on consulting them.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26199261993 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54143104321 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.765294954 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440796633711 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137906850236 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118141047581 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279319382572 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125252442421 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.