Keeping pets around children has become a controversial issue. While many people argue that maintenance of pets is beneficial for children, others refute it. This essay will discuss although conservation of domestic animals has some positive aspects, but why it is better that do not protect them while having children.
On the one hand, many people believe that the maintenance of domestic animals can improve children's responsibility sense. Because children have duties to feeding, upbringing, and grooming of their pets, they learn to be more responsible about their roles which take over in the future. Furthermore, they learn to take care of another life and also become more sensitive and sympathetic. A result of research had been done by the Cambridge Developmental Psychology Unit shows people who had pets in their childhood are more empathise and simply take charge of their actions. For these reasons, some contend that keeping pets by children is reasonable.
On the contrary, many think that protect animals are hazardous for children. It seems that their claim is justified according to some records which indicate sometimes pets cause many bacterial-disease for children, and occasionally they back to their wild temperament and hurt to children physically. For instance, a science medical university in the US recorded several reports about children who had been injured by their pets that consider animals can be dangerous and unhealthy for children. Hence, keeping pets might be hazardous for children.
The maintenance of pets for children was always a challenging issue among people. This essay argued as regards that the children's health is the most important worry for parents if there is the least risk in keeping animals, it would be better that parents refrain from this work for their children's health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, as regards, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3275862069 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79216885173 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5427194449 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277747314887 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11544496531 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610507301051 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181852729143 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649006779661 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.