Some people think that a law should exist so that young people under 18 cannot be out after the midnight, others think it should not be. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been raging debate that young people under 18 should be prohibited to venture out post-midnight. Some experts believe that there should be a strict law for all young people, while some believe otherwise. I personally believe that there should not be any restrictions levied. In this essay, we will argue both the views using examples to demonstrate points and prove arguments.
On the on hand, there is ample evidence that states that young people under 18 should no roam around the city post-midnight. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly, young people under 18 are said to be naïve and hence they tend to fall prey to bad habits like alcohol and drugs which are easily available in parties or clubs. For example, recent research by Hindustan Times states that cases of young people under 18 in drunk driving and overdose of drugs has accelerated by 15% over last 2 years. Secondly, city is very quiet and deserted post-midnight which makes it very easy for kidnapping or hurting young people who are roaming out alone in the city. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that young people alone by themselves should not be allowed to roam around freely in the night.
On the other hand, many experts debate that putting restrictions on young people is not the solution, but implementing strict laws for offenders is necessary. We are living in a free world where people have a right to move around freely especially young people who are very eager to explore life. Instead of putting restriction on young people, the government should ensure safety of them by implementing strict laws like not serving alcohol in parties to people under age of 18 years. In case of violation, strict action should be taken against night clubs. Similarly, strong law should be levied against drug peddlers and smugglers so that drugs are not supplied. For example, an extensive study by Oxford University states that countries like Japan and China has low crime rate across all age people as they have strict laws. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that putting restrictions is not the solution.
From the arguments and examples given I firmly believe that it is a fundamental right of every citizen to move around freely in his/her city at any time. By imposing law will only create unrest among people. However, in order to control the crime rate and mishaps, government has a right to impose strict law for its citizen.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89397590361 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51283134769 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498795180723 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.227092187 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.894736842 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358063186003 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119328043054 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847557455602 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221215070344 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120757095465 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.