Some people think libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While computers are considered an economical source of getting information, many people choose traditional methods of acquiring data which means to read books in libraries. In my opinion, instead of replacing libraries with computers, both facilities should be available to knowledge seekers at one place which would be less expensive.
People believe that contemporary methods, such as computers should be introduced by ending libraries. It is thought that computer labs are less expensive than maintaining libraries. As computers are more effective to acquire information, it can store a large size of data. Also, it requires only one set of a book and that can be copied and transferred as many times as needed. Therefore, a large space to arrange copies of books in shelves is not needed which can, resultantly, save a large amount. In addition, there is not any threat that soft copies of books will tear apart, and heavy cost will be incur in their repair because data in computers is safer than books in racks.
Mostly people, on the other hand, are not computer literate, therefore significance of libraries cannot be overlooked. Elderly people prefer reading books, magazines in hard form rather on computers because they find reading on a screen pretty difficult. Moreover, if data on a computer gets deleted, it will be almost impossible to recover it. It might cost a hefty amount to avail services of a computer expert. However, a torn book can be repaired easily.
In my opinion, libraries should upgrade their system by including one or two computer labs. This would allow people to go for their priorities. Furthermore, an already existed library building can serve two purposes which is more economical than making arrangements for computers by replacing libraries.
To conclude, although computer is an efficient modern technology to read, store and transfer books, data and content, a library can fulfill the needs of both young as well as old generation by having both facilities under one roof. Therefore, replacing libraries with computers is not going to save money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 165, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ary can fulfill the needs of both young as well as old generation by having both facilitie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23303834808 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81589650961 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554572271386 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3734188819 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182691424868 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656643202 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487056342567 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118790824701 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325702036214 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.