Some people think that managers alone should take decisions in the company while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Involvemnet of blue-collar job holders in decision making progress is discussed in modern organizational management. Though full-control of managers over the work-environment is proven method for a firm’s growth, participation of general staff cannot be omitted either to approach a problem in detail and to develop leadership. In this essay, the outcome of both of these approaches will be discussed, followed by opinion.
Managers are trained official to attain organizational goals. The decision making process of these people involves technical analysis of available information and the best use of available resources. To illustrate, a production manager, tasked to increase the number of quantity produced, focuses on the bottle-necks of the complete process and keeps expanding the identified obstacles to improve the production. Managers retain the company vision, which direct their thinking, resulting in the more appropriate deicisons. Moreover , supervisors paly the role of bridge between owner and workers by reducing expectation gap. As they maintain direct contact with both the parties, it is easy to share what the top-management expects. Similarly, the results of workers are carried to the high-officials. So their decision-making role plays a vital part in keeping balance between them.
On the other hand, Involvement of employees in decision making offers the management to get better view over situations. In other words, as workers practically face the situations, they can provide detailed information and recommend the right ways to deal with a situation, if given the floor. Referring to, “The Economis-June 2018”, organizations invloving general staff in decision making has proven to have better capability to tackle the problems evolving from changing economy. From that ground, involvement of general employees in the management is rewarding. Furthermore, such involvement ensures the development of future managers , who also becomes satisfied and loyal to the company. As the workers find their views to be recognized, they remains satisfied, which also provide them the scope to learn to handle critical situation. The importance of developing future managers is crutial for the success of a firm.
To conclude, bringing workers on the decision-making table along with the managers is a new concept, which offers the oppotunity to focus on micro-components of a sutuation. In my opinion, to run a company successfully, involvement of general staff is important to develop future management members and decide the right decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the more appropriate deicisons. Moreover , supervisors paly the role of bridge bet...
^^
Line 9, column 649, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sures the development of future managers , who also becomes satisfied and loyal to...
^^
Line 9, column 760, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'remain'
Suggestion: remain
...find their views to be recognized, they remains satisfied, which also provide them the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74025974026 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29014344686 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8504089404 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244648659751 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707659446491 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576559567859 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144443091249 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163552519302 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.