Some people think that new technologies benefits the life of workers whereas some deny the statement.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
With the developments in technologies, the quality of work culture has improved, which has uplifted the life of employees, according to some people, while others believe that it actually has degraded the life. In my opinion, I believe that technology has really changed the face of workplaces, it is the excessive utilization of it by employers, which has made the life of employees a living hell.
In several ways, technological advancement has revolutionize the work practices. These days, employers are concerned about the safety of their workers and therefore they have installed advanced safety measures, which was often ignored in the past. Moreover, the need to go to an office has become a thing of the past because people can work from virtually anywhere by using their own machines. For instance, a pregnant woman can continue her work from home rather than going on maternity leaves. Thus, technology has certainly played a huge rule in betterment of the workers.
However, it is also a main reason for degrading the quality of life as whole. When people can work from anywhere, they end up continuously working, which simply has removed the boundary between work and life. In other words, work-life balance is just mirage that we try to chase while working nonstop from everywhere. For instance, the time after the office hour, which people can use to spend with friends and family, is now used to finish pending work. Furthermore, the excessive sitting in front of the screens has detrimental impact on the health, it weakens the eyesight and an invitation to other illnesses in the long run, which is nothing but a curse by technology. In short, technology has turned human in to machines.
In conclusion, although technology has some downside, its role cannot be ignored in making life easy. Thus, people should learn to what extent they want to leverage technology to use it effectively and efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'revolutionized'.
Suggestion: revolutionized
...ral ways, technological advancement has revolutionize the work practices. These days, employe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06603773585 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77949889324 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2813973838 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140233492995 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499186090781 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381487734354 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100113073772 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043802217252 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.