People especially mothers often decide to stay at home to look after their family instead of going to work.
Do you think government should pay them the salary for it?
When both parents are working, female often sacrifices her career to take care of the family. Although, many people do not award enough credit it deserves, it is one of the most complicated and undermined job in the world. In my opinion, it certainly deserves appreciation but not in the form of government compensation. There should be other ways in which they can be rewarded.
To begin with, taking care is without a doubt the most crucial work in the world, which demands enormous amount of hard work and dedication without a single day off. It is considered as a selfless duty where people do not work for any praise or reward, and this generosity is what makes our society great. For instance, children raised under the care from a family member are more likely to lead a happy and content life than the one who was looked after by servants or nanny. Since females are more sensitive and compassionate, they are natural at taking care of the house. Thus, people who are involved in this kind of business deserve some kind of reward.
However, it is not justifiable to distribute government payment for the individual decision and moral responsibility. Moreover, 30% of population of India is housewives, imagine the amount of burden it can put on national treasure, which is tax-payers hard-earned money, if authorities begin to pay for being housewives. On the other hand, authorities can promote mumpreneurship, which is in trending these days, to encourage people to indulge in self –employment while they are at home. So not only people can earn for living but also be beneficial to economy. This is way better than paying to people who look after their families.
In conclusion, being housewife is a demanding job and they do deserve reward for it but payment from authorities is not an ideal approach. Thus, people should be engaged in better way to assist them as well as society as whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85321100917 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78758213257 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0774801442 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217576184402 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663971023285 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396904917812 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122261242426 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031749845418 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.