Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
A number of people assume that technological advancements have a positive influence on the living standards of employees. On the other side of the argument are those who consider that it produces certain drawbacks for working people. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and then I will give my own opinion on the matter.
On the one side are individuals who consider that new technologies improve the lives of workers. They would support their point of view by the fact that technologies enhance the performance of a worker making it more energy-efficient and productive. For instance, such innovations as automated-machines made it possible to increase production enormously in comparison with that time when people were doing it manually. Consequently, people spend less time on the same load of work and can use released time and energy for creative activities, rest, sport, or even family and communication with other people.
However, it possible to make the opposite case. On the other side, technological improvements may increase the level of unemployment because the demand for labor will be decreasing and will be significantly hard to win a competition among thousands of people with similar qualification. As a result, plenty of people may become homeless and desperate. For example, modern strait people in America are persons who have higher education awards and very decent individuals who happened to lose their jobs and were not able to pay rent. Thus, along with high-tech, different social circumstances may be raised.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their merits. On balance, however, I believe that technological advantages have more benefits than drawbacks. With the appearance of hew, technologies live in general became much easier and comfortable. Meanwhile, the government should take into account the increasing unemployment and create a plan for overcoming it and not letting citizens decrease their level of life due to lack of job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-09 | sdfjklsdfjsdl | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-22 | Mariamirabella | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | Sewak Singh | 78 | view |
- There are fewer controls over the designs and construction of home and office buildings. So, people can build them however they like. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Letter of request You are traveling and need someone to do you a favor while you are gone Write a letter asking a neighbor or friend for help In your letter include Where you are going What the favor is Why you need this friend to help 73
- It will be better to have wide use of driverless car for individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- The length of working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people who care for the elderly do not have enough time to look after them What are the problems related to this What are some possible solutions 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will give my own opinion on the matter. On the one side are individuals who cons...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32075471698 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1381442052 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8429428988 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271957687722 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076955438397 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447787105547 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152259092559 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437268337437 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will give my own opinion on the matter. On the one side are individuals who cons...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32075471698 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1381442052 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8429428988 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271957687722 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076955438397 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447787105547 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152259092559 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437268337437 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.