Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
It is often argued that the development of technology is seriously necessary to live our life more comfortable. Some people might say that the latest scientific development has been enhanced the quality of lifestyle for employees whereas, others claim that it shows a couple of disadvantages for them. Although the science makes people's life more effective, I personally think that it results the disadvantages for workers. This essay will address the both views of new technology like how it affects employee's life.
First of all, the modern development makes happen to work at home. To put it another way, when workers need to work their home temporarily for some social crisis such as Covid-19, they may use some portable devices which are needed for workplace because the majority of business can be operated by electronic documents. For example, when employer demands jobs to the employees, they can use the ipad or laptor to fill up a report to submit because most electronic data is easy to handle by IT equipment. Thus, technological things become to improve the workers' lifestyle to work efficiently.
On the other hand, some disadvantages would be expressed as a consequence. Their brain work may decrease because so many new technologies do their tasks instead, so they tend to not think twice to be done their jobs. Moreover, when individuals are going lazy through it, the efficiency of work is also declined and then they are going to have very poor life due to the wage decreasing. Furthermore, when employees salary is down, they might have a conflict with their owner because they might lose their job. Therefore, these disadvantages of new development would influence the rate of unemployment.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that the recent technology gives comfort, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages in terms of the work atmosphere. We need to encourage people to not depend on this type of technological development to maintain their occupations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 554, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...hnological things become to improve the workers lifestyle to work efficiently. On th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95565585605 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0032198489 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255977487233 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848740914067 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611141186535 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149314069156 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734604294555 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.