Some people think that people who do physical work should be paid as same as the people who have a high-level degree. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by a significant number of individuals that labour jobs and educated jobs should be considered in terms of salary. I completely disagree and believe that the difference will motivate people to have education and society will not respect the education system if both get equal pay.
To begin with, people will not respect the education system if both labour and educated people are paid with the same salary. Mostly uneducated people do physical work to earn money for living, if they are also provided with same wages as education degree holders are provided, people will not spend time in getting educated as the majority of the youth take education for better future prospects and high earning options. Therefore, there will be no difference in educated and uneducated youths as both will have access to all facilities because of the same salary. Thus salary discrimination is a must to create the importance of education in society.
Secondly, the people who do physical work will never find motivated towards getting an education if they are paid similar to educated individuals. Acquiring knowledge is essential to have a civilized lifestyle and to minimize poverty, therefore, money is the prime way to encourage people to have higher education. For that reason, governments of various nations provide free school education to motivate their people to have access to education, so that it will benefit people to increase their living standards by earning high salaries.
In conclusion, I completely disagree because of the reasons mentioned in the above paragraphs and believe that this difference will create more awareness of acquiring education in a civilized society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... facilities because of the same salary. Thus salary discrimination is a must to crea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...salary. Thus salary discrimination is a must to create the importance of education in s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26470588235 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76032193098 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496323529412 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3964537892 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248165191738 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109772814313 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739929247166 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148673766193 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941292849208 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.