Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills
more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use
specific details and examples to explain your view.
In today's competitive world, every individual is supposed to possess many personality traits in order to be successful. Among various qualities, cognitive skills are of the utmost importance. Some people opine that group activities play a very vital role in the improvement of such skills whereas others hold the notion that team effort doesn't play a much significant part in the development. I am a strong advocate of the former point of view that group activities do increase mental abilities. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints.
Group activities strengthen the intellectual skill in many ways. First and foremost, by participating in group activities, ability to think and understand others point of view increases. For instance, by doing group studies, if an individual is facing an issue on some topic, peer knowledge can help to refine understanding of concepts. Similarly, while studying together, the individual tries to understand other group member doubt as well. Such actions eventually increase logical skill. Group studies are already practised in schools in many countries. For example, in South Korea, secondary school timings are from 8:00 A.M. to 6 P.M. In these institutions, a major portion of the time is specified for group studies, and the Korean education system is considered best in the world. Moreover, team games require players to perform a diverse range of rapid mental calculations, which clearly improves rational abilities.
On the other hand, some people believe that by doing self-activities like independent studies intellectual skills can develop. However, in my opinion, self-study confines a person to just individual ideas. This wouldn't improve one’s knowledgeable ability like group activities do.
To recapitulate, it is undebatable to mention that group activities improve intellectual skill to a wider extent. In my point of view, the government should majorly involve group activities in a school curriculum, so that kids can start improving skills from their learning phase itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...others hold the notion that team effort doesnt play a much significant part in the dev...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...a person to just individual ideas. This wouldnt improve one's knowledgeable abilit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52380952381 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03347245783 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9122996297 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223602251397 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692373140516 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538440215687 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146209969746 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190552718929 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.