Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities.To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.
Team work has its paramount importance in several aspects of life. As per the stated notion, it is argued that performing task in groups enhances intellectual development of an individual. It is agreed that cognitive abilities of a person could be improved by working in a team. This essay will discuss the above point along with relevant examples followed by a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, working in a team fosters the thinking ability of an individual. To explain this further, people performing in groups tend to think more effectively and discuss their views to achieve their goal. Also, this would help in widening horizons of knowledge by sharing ideas with each other. Not only this, their creative power is also enhanced by planning strategies altogether in a group discussion. They use their imaginative power to accomplish their goals. One good illustration of this is team games in which players are more likely to think in accordance with team members to win and compete. Consequently, their imaginative and cognitive skills get improved by imbibing others ideas and imaginations. What is more, group work requires people skill wherein each individual have unique abilities. By learning and acquiring skills from others, people gain confidence. They tend to develop their mental abilities more as they co-ordinate with each other. For instance, several organizations have gained success by working collaboratively. People become more responsible and inter-dependent where they have to discuss and participate as a whole within a team. In addition, team management helps in building other necessary skills as well.
In conclusion, collaborative work has positively affected the performance of an individual by improving cognitive and mental abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 932, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... to develop their mental abilities more as they co-ordinate with each other. For i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03772424605 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578181818182 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3927814127 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7222222222 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199851339555 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641689755233 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561232326559 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105068887304 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682502356148 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.