Some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success, while others believe this depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Whether happiness is defined by money or not has sparked many debates recently. While some believe that there is a direct connection between money and happiness, others, however, are of the opinion that being happy in life is subject to other factors.
On the one hand, many contend that having money contributes to happiness. First, being wealthy and totally independent, these so-called millionaires are able to live their dream. They are capable of purchasing almost anything that they wish to have; be it a deluxe house with plenty of rooms and recreational areas or luxury and modern cars. Second, in terms of facing conundrums, privileged people can readily resolve them. Here, money is not a subject to them, and in turn, they do not encounter the obstacles that middle class or underprivileged groups normally do. Thus, well-off (affluent) people are bound to live happier lives.
On the other hand, others put forward the argument that some different factors are of paramount importance in this respect. First and foremost, it is alleged that, irrespective of how prosperous one is, if their relationships are stormy or even if they are left alone, it does not matter how big your house is. Simply put, one can be both wealthy and extremely unhappy at the same time only because there is no one to share happy moments. Second, money can not fix all of the implications in the world. Chronic diseases and incurable conditions are salient illustrations that even having all of the fortunes on the planet will not be of any value.
In conclusion, although the prevailing idea that being rich will lead to a happy life, which is tempting and desirable for many, it cannot be the only item related to achieving happiness. Since there are some factors that cannot be bought, I believe putting efforts to improve different aspects of life, as well as economic success, is important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...appy moments. Second, money can not fix all of the implications in the world. Chronic dise...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... salient illustrations that even having all of the fortunes on the planet will not be of a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95583596215 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65377130974 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593059936909 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9133493864 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.733333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185149730541 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563004979084 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807753618164 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117478059795 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675303635588 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.